| Tabled Date | Amendment Text |
| 09/10/2025 | Leave out all after ‘That this Assembly’ and insert:
‘acknowledges media reports regarding the approval of Irish language street signs by Belfast City Council; recognises that a non-response from residents does not represent opposition to proposals for the addition of Irish language street signs; notes that the Dual Language Street Signs Policy operating in Belfast City Council adheres to the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages; and believes the current policy can help create, safe, welcoming spaces for residents from all backgrounds and traditions.’
|
| 09/10/2025 | Leave out all after ‘That this Assembly’ and insert:
‘affirms its support for the promotion and development of the Irish language; notes that Belfast City Council's 15 per cent threshold for support for Irish language signage is informed by guidance from the UN Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues; condemns attempts by elected representatives to weaponise the Irish language to stoke sectarian division; further notes that Belfast City Council's Dual Language Street Signs policy is consistent with the British Government's ratification of the European Charter for Regional Minority Languages, and its support for both Irish and Ulster Scots; calls on the Executive to appoint the Irish Language and the Ulster Scots and the Ulster British tradition commissioners without further delay; and further calls on the Executive to meaningfully invest in Irish-medium education, Irish language community groups, youth services and to expand the number of public services delivered in Irish, including health and social care.’
|
| 09/10/2025 | Leave out all after ‘That this Assembly’ and insert:
‘recognises that the Irish language is a valuable part of our shared heritage and cultural diversity; notes the increasing interest in, and usage of, the Irish language from across our community; commends those who are promoting and teaching the language; supports steps to protect and promote indigenous languages, including through provision of dual language street signage, in line with best practice and international standards; believes that any process for bilingual signage should be fair, transparent and command the confidence of local residents; acknowledges that the 15 per cent threshold is appropriate to trigger further consideration of an application; further believes that signs should be erected where a majority of respondents to a survey are in favour; and calls on all local councils to take into account the wishes and views of local residents.’
|